arghh
being driven mad by having to write a brief for legal writing in favour of why the defendant shouldn’t be allowed to suppress evidence
except as it’s a closed brief, we have to use the legal materials given to us and thus i’m not allowed to point out the very simple answer that the defendant can’t benefit from the exclusionary rule because her rights weren’t actually violated, because the evidence against her was taken from her son’s car
(and the legal materials are obviously ambiguous because there’s people arguing for the suppression and i actually think they have the more favourable precedent with these cases, especially as i’m not allowed to use the plain view doctrine either. so very annoying)
-
booklover81 liked this
-
huskyblue posted this
